SHIV KAILASH VERMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIA/2657/2025 · 2025-03-07
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126971 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126971 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14047 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2657 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shiv Kailash Verma Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Prasad Gupta,Durgesh Kumar Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing counsel for the State-respondents and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed with a prayer to issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the opposite parties to consider his representation and post the petitioner either in District Lucknow, Barabanki, Unnao or Sitapur and with a further prayer to sanction the medical leave of the petitioner and pay the salary with other benefits to the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is suffering from major disease i.e. Neurocognitive Disorder (MMSE 22) and on account of the fact that his son was disappeared and has not been located till date. He further submits that the petitioner is undergoing treatment at Lucknow and is presently posted on the post of Consolidator at Sonbhadra, therefor, he had made a request to the opposite parties that he may be posted at Lucknow. 4. Considering the fact that his treatment is going on at Lucknow and a prayer has been made for a suitable direction to be issued to the opposite parties to consider and decide his representation. 5. Learned Standing counsel, on the other hand, has submitted that considering the nature of disease from which petitioner is suffering, he can take medical leave which is admissible to him to undergo the treatment but does not make any objection with regard to the prayer made by the petitioner to consider and decide his representation expeditiously. 6. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with a direction
to the opposite party no. 2 to decide the representation of the petitioner dated 28.2.2025 expeditiously preferably within a period of three weeks from the date of production of a certified copy of this order in accordance with law and communicate the decision to the petitioner. 7. Considering the nature of disease from which petitioner is suffering, opposite parties are restrained from taking any coercive action against the petitioner till disposal of the representation. .
(Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 7.3.2025 AKK Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench