Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Second Bail Application No.296 of 2024
Amaan
….....Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ….….Respondent
Present:- Mr. Ankur Sharma, Advocate for the applicant. Ms. Rangoli Purohit, Brief Holder for the State.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Applicant is in judicial custody in Case Crime No. 225 of 2024, under Section 115 (2), 118 (2), 351 (3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, Police Station Vikasnagar, District Dehradun. He has sought his release on bail.
2.
Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.
3.
It is argued that the co-accused having similar role has already been granted bail.
4.
This fact is admitted by learned State counsel.
5.
Having considered, this Court is of the view that it is a case fit for bail and the applicant deserves to be enlarged on bail.
6.
The bail application is allowed.
7.
Let the applicant be released on bail, on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable
2 sureties, each of the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
(Ravindra Maithani, J) 05.03.2025 Jitendra