ANJALI CHAKRABORTY v. NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY AND ORS
WP(C)/2742/2025 · 2025-06-08
Suman Shyam
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12696 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12696 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010106462025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2742/2025 ANJALI CHAKRABORTY W/O LT RANJIT CHAKRABORTY D/O LT SARAT BARUAH R/O BRICK FIELD COLONY PO AND PS LUMDING DIST HOJAI ASSAM PIN 782447 PRESENTLY RESIDING AT FULUGURI MAJBAT PO AND PS MAJBAT DIST UDALGURI PIN 784507 ASSAM VERSUS NORTHEAST FRONTIER RAILWAY AND ORS N F RAILWAY MALIGAN GUWAHATI 11 RAIL BHAWAN 1 RAISINA ROAD NEW DELHI INDIA PIN 110001 2:GENERAL RAILWAY MANAGER NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY MALIGAON GUWAHATYI 11 3:DIVISIONAL RAILWAY MANAGER NORTH EAST FRONTIER RAILWAY LUMDING PIN 78244 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R P HAZARIKA, TUN RAJKHOWA Advocate for the Respondent : DY.S.G.I., MR. S P CHOUDHURY (C.G.C)
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM ORDER 09.06.2025 Mr. R. P. Hazarika, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is
Page No.# 2/2 alternative remedy available to the petitioner before the Central Administrative Tribunal and therefore, the petitioner be granted leave to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to pursue such remedy. Mr. S. P. Choudhury, learned Central Government Counsel is present and does not have any objection if the prayer for withdrawal is allowed by this Court. In view of the above, the writ petition stands disposed of on withdrawal with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant