MOHD MUZAMMIL v. State of U.P. THRU PRINCIPAL SEC. HOME AND 4 OTHERS
A482/2010/2025 · 2025-03-04
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126932 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12868 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2010 of 2025 Applicant :- Mohd Muzammil Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru Principal Sec. Home And 4 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ramendra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for respondent State. At the outset, learned A.G.A. has raised objection that against the impugned order which is passed under Section 12 of the D.V. Act statutory appeal lie under Section 29 of the D.V. Act. Perused the record. A perusal of the record shows that it is not a case where exceptional jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C. can be exercised. There appears to be no grave error in the order impugned. The petitioner can very well avail the remedy as provided under law. In view of the above, the application is dismissed with liberty to the applicant to avail appropriate remedy of appeal provided under Section 29 of the D.V. Act. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench