1 2025:CGHC:6551 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 778 of 2020 1 - Vimal Naidu S/o Late Shri Latari Ram Naidu Aged About 52 Years 2 - Naveen Naidu S/o Late Latari Ram Naidu, Aged About 48 Years 3 - Smt. Reena Naidu, W/o Late Raju Naidu, Aged About 54 Years 4 - Smt. Neha Naidu, W/o Late Sunil Naidu, Aged About 50 Years No. 1 to 4 are resident of Baron Bazar, Police Station Kotwali, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 5 - Bhojraj Naidu S/o Late Shri L.R. Naidu, Aged About 58 Years R/o Near Community Building, Baron Bazar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Smt. Meera Madhwani W/o Late Aatmaram Madhwani, Aged About 70 Years R/o Golden Tower, Amlidih, P.S. Rajendra Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Lalit Kumar Agrawal S/o Late Jagdish Prasad Agrawal, Aged About 54 Years R/o Ashwani Nagar, P.S. Purani Basti, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Ashok Kumar Khandelwal S/o Late Brijmohan Khandelwal, Aged About 64 Years R/o Mahoba Bazar, P.S. Amanaka, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House OfÏcer, Police Station, Gole Bazar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Somnath Batra S/o Late Khanchand Batra R/o Panchvati Nagar, Mowa, Tehsil And District Raipur Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) 2 For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Senior Advocate alongwith Ms. Kanchan Kalwani, Advocate. For Respondent/State : Mr. Sakib Ahmed, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No. 2 : Mr. Raghavendra Pradhan, Advocate. Hon’ble Mr. Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon’ble Mr. Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 05/02/2025 1. By this petition under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, the petitioners seek quashing of the FIR bearing Crime No. 146/2019 registered at Police Station, Gol Bazar, Raipur, District Raipur for the offences punishable under Section 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code. 2. At the very outset, Mr. Sakib Ahmed, learned Panel Lawyer appearing for the State/respondent No. 1 submits that the investigation in the matter has been concluded and the charge sheet has also been filed and as such, this petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. In view of the above submission, Ms. Singhai, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to take recourse to law, if the petitioners are aggrieved by the charge sheet. 4. It is ordered accordingly. 5. Consequently, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforestated liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) JUDGE CHIEF JUSTICE Amit AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Digitally signed by AMIT KUMAR DUBEY Date: 2025.02.06 14:41:31 +0530