BAKRIDI AHMAD ALIAS BAKRIDI AND 3 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. THE PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/2087/2025 · 2025-03-06
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126884 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126884 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13699 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2087 of 2025 Applicant :- Bakridi Ahmad Alias Bakridi And 3 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. The Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Suraj Singh Visen Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Heard. At the very outset, learned Counsel for the applicant stated that on account of some formal defects, he may be permitted to withdraw the instant application with liberty to file the same afresh. The prayer sought has not been opposed by learned A.G.A.. In view of the above, the instant application is rejected as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. The certified copy of the impugned order or any other certified document filed along with the application shall be returned to the learned Counsel for the applicant by retaining a photocopy of the same on record. Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Mohit Singh/- Digitally signed by :- MOHIT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench