- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM WRIT PETITION NO.137 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: 1. SRI Y C HUCHAMASTI GOWDA LATE CHANNEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS R/A NO.370 3RD C MAIN HEALTH LAYOUT SRIGANDHADA KAVAL BENGALURU 5670091. 2. SARASWATHI C W/O LATE RAMU S M AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS NO.442 4TH MAIN NAGENDRA BLOCK SRINAGAR BANASHANAKRI BENGALURU 5600050. 3. L ARVIND S/O LATE D L LINGEGOWDA AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS NO.2603 38TH CROSS 26TH MAIN JAYANAGAR 9TH BLOCK BENGALURU 560069. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. NAGARAJU., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY URBAN DEVELOPKENT DEPARKMTENT VIKASA SOUDHDA BENGALURU 560001. Digitally signed by AL BHAGYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 2. THE BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANAGARA PALIKE REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER N R SQUARE, BENGALURU 5670002 3. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING RAJARAJESHWARINAGARA BRUHAT BENGALURU MAHANGARTA PALIKE IDEAL HOME LAYOUT, R R NAGAR BENGALURU 5600098. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.SPOORTHY V., HCGP FOR R1 SRI. K.B.MONESH KUMAR., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO GRANT AN ORDER DECLARING THAT THE ENTIRE KARNATAKA MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AND CERTAIN OTHER LAW (AMENDMENT) ACT, 2021 (KARNATAKA ACT NO. 01 OF 2022) NOTIFIED ON 13/01/2022 AS CONTAINED IN ANN-F AS BEING ULTRA VIRES THE CONSTITUTION IN SO FAR PETITIONER AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM ORAL ORDER The captioned petition is filed seeking the following reliefs: a) Grant an order declaring that the entire Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No. 01 of 2022) notified on 13.01.2022 as contained in ANNEXURE-F as being ultra vires the Constitution in so far Petitioner; b) Grant an order declaring that Section 18-A of the Karnataka Town & Country Planning Act, 1961 brought into effect by Karnataka Act No.23 of 2004 (Karnataka Town & Country Planning (Amendment) Act, 1998) as contained in ANNEXURE-D as being ultra vires the Constitution in so far Petitioner; c) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of Certiorari quashing the Notification issued by the 1st Respondent bearing No.UDD 23 TTP 2020 (E) dated 21.06.2021 as contained in ANNEXURE-E in so far as the amended Rule 37-A and 37-C is concerned in so far Petitioner; d) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the Office Order - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 No.HaNiNaYo/PR/461/2021-22 dated 09.03.2022 issued by Respondent No.2 as contained in ANNEXURE-G in so far Petitioner; e) Grant an order declaring that the entire Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023 (Karnataka Act No. 37 of 2024) notified by Respondent No.1 on 16/08/2024 as contained in ANNEXURE-J as being ultra vires the Constitution in so far Petitioner; f) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the demand notice bearing BBMP/Ad.Com/RJH/1194/24-25 dated 31/12/2024 as contained in ANNEXURE-H insofar as the levy of ground rent, license fee, scrutiny fees, betterment fee, security deposit, lake rejuvenation fee, water supply scheme cess, ring road formation cess, slum improvement cess, MRTS Surcharge and 5% service charge, labour welfare charge/cess is concerned; g) Grant an order, direction or writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent Nos.2 to issue fresh sanction plan to the Petitioner without insistence of the fess specified at "I. Fee Payable To BBMP" (i.e., scrutiny fee, license fees, security deposit, ground rent, lake rejuvenation fee, - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 betterment levy on site & building, cess for water supply scheme, cess for ring road, cess for improving slum board, cess for mass rapid transport, 5% BBMP Service charges, labour charges/cess) as contained in demand notice bearing BBMP/Ad.Com/RJH/1194/24- 25 dated 31/12/2024 contained in Annexure- H, in so far Petitioner; h) Grant an order, direction or declare that the various fees levied on the basis of the guidance value of the property are all bad in law and unconstitutional; and i) Pass such other relief/s as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit to grant, including cost of the Petitioner, in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court that across the Bar, the issue is dealt by the Co-ordinate Bench in the reported judgment in W.P.No.23086/2022 and connected matters. The Co-ordinate Bench, while deciding the issue, has set-aside the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022) and the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024). Therefore, this Court deems it fit to cull out the operative portion of the order, which reads as under; "ORDER (i) The writ petitions are partly allowed. (ii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2021 (Karnataka Act No.01 of 2022), is hereby quashed and set aside. (iii) The Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Act, 2023, (Karnataka Act No.37 of 2024), is hereby quashed and set aside. (iv) It is hereby declared that the provisions contained in Section 18-A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, read with Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only in respect of ‘Development Plan’ containing the proposal for construction on plots measuring more than 20,000 square meters in extent and not in respect of plots measuring less than 20,000 square meters. (v) It is hereby declared that if fee has been earlier collected for change of land use or while approving a layout plan, fee shall not be collected for subsequent ‘Development Plan’ in terms of the ‘Note’ - 7 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 found below TABLE I of Rule 37-A of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965. (vi) It is hereby declared that the linking of the fee leviable under Rule 37-A of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, to the ‘market value’ or ‘guidance value’ as determined under Section 45-B of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1957, is illegal. However, liberty is reserved to the respondent-State Government and the BBMP to re-fix a standard after collecting empherical data. (vii) Consequently, all the impugned Circulars which seek to give effect to the Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are hereby quashed and set aside. (viii) It is hereby declared that Clause 3.8 of the Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike Building Bye- laws, 2003, providing for ‘Ground Rent’, is illegal and are accordingly quashed and set aside. (ix) Consequently, all the impugned Demand Notices raised by the respondent-BBMP, in respect of the writ petitioners herein are also quashed and set aside. It would be advisable that the BBMP may come out with a scheme for ‘One Time Settlement’ and settle the levy and collect the fee generally acceptable to the citizens of Bengaluru. This would also augment the present situation." - 8 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 3. In the present writ petition, the core issue raised stands substantially covered and decided by the authoritative pronouncement of the coordinate bench, wherein the writ petitions were partly allowed and several consequential reliefs were granted. The Hon’ble Court, in unequivocal terms, quashed and set aside the Karnataka Municipal Corporations and Certain Other Law (Amendment) Acts of 2021 and 2023 (Karnataka Act Nos.01 of 2022 and 37 of 2024 respectively). 4. The Court further declared that the provisions under Section 18-A of the Karnataka Town and Country Planning Act, 1961, read with Rules 37-A and 37-C of the Karnataka Planning Authority Rules, 1965, are applicable only to development proposals concerning plots exceeding 20,000 square meters, and not to smaller plots. Importantly, it was also held that if a fee has been previously collected for change of land use or approval of layout plan, no further fee shall be levied for subsequent - 9 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 development plans, in view of the explanatory 'Note' to Table I of Rule 37-A. 5. The Court declared illegal the linkage of such levies to market or guidance value under Section 45-B of the Karnataka Stamp Act, and consequently, quashed all Circulars and demand notices issued to give effect to such unlawful interpretations. Clause 3.8 of the BBMP Building Bye-laws, 2003, imposing 'Ground Rent', was also struck down. 6. In view of these comprehensive declarations and findings, it is submitted that the controversy raised in the present writ petition no longer survives for adjudication independently, as it is squarely covered by the binding judgment of the coordinate bench. In the light of the law laid down in reported judgment substantially covering the issue, which is raised in the captioned writ petition, the writ petition is liable to be allowed strictly aligning to the operative portion of the said writ petition. - 10 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 7. In view of the above, this Court proceeds to pass the following; ORDER (i) The writ petition is allowed. (ii) The impugned demand notice dated 31.12.2024 issued by respondent No.3 as per Annexure-H is hereby set-aside. (iii) Respondent No.2 and 3 are hereby directed to issue fresh sanction plan . (iv) Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are hereby directed to forthwith process the petitioner's application seeking building license and sanction of the building plan, strictly in accordance with law. (v) It is made clear that the issuance of the building license and approval plan shall not be withheld merely on the ground that the BBMP is contemplating to file an appeal against the reported judgment. (vi) If the building license and sanction plan are issued, the same shall be subjected - 11 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:20864 WP No. 137 of 2025 to the outcome of any appeal that may be filed by the BBMP against the judgment. Pending applications, if any, are also disposed off. SD/- (SACHIN SHANKAR MAGADUM) JUDGE KLY