Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010105902025 2025:GAU-AS:6665 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2675/2025 KHADIJA BEGUM BARBHUIYA WIFE OF SELIM UDDIN BARBHUIYA, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE LALPANI PART II, BAGKHAL,P.O. AND P.S. LAKHIPUR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM PIN CODE- 788103 VERSUS THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION AND 4 ORS. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER, PANJABARI, GUWAHATI-781037 2:THE SECRETARY THE ASSAM STATE ELECTION COMMISSION PANJABARI GUWAHATI-781037 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR SILCHAR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM. 4:THE CO-DISTRICT COMMISSIONER LAKHIPUR CO-DISTRICT VILLAGE AND P.O. LAKHIPUR DISTRICT CACHAR ASSAM 5:THE DISTRICT ELECTION OFFICER CACHAR SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR Page No.# 2/3 ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. R MAJUMDAR, MS. J GHOSH,MR. JUNM LASKAR Advocate for the Respondent : SC, A S E C, GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN DEV CHOUDHURY ORDER 26.05.2025 1. Heard Mr. R. Majumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. R. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel for the State Election Commissioner, Assam. 2. The present writ petition is filed with a limited grievance that though the petitioner obtained a total 1561 votes and his nearest candidate obtained 1312 votes in the last Panchayat Election, for the post of Anchalik Panchayat Member of 2 No. Lakhipur under 18 No. Lalpani Gaon Panchayat of 3/3 No. Lakhimpur Dilkush Zilla Parishad, District Cachar, Assam, however, till date the election result has not been declared. 3. Mr. Dubey, learned Standing Counsel for the State Election Commission, Assam has produced a sheet disclosing declaration of result of all the Anchalik Panchayat Members in the district Cachar. The constituency from which the petitioner contested, is reflected at Serial No. 19 (18 No. Lalpani Gaon Panchayat of 3/3 No. Lakhimpur Dilkush Zilla Parishad), which goes to show that the name of the elected candidate is Rubina Wahid Laskar for Assam Gana Parishad. 4. In view of the aforesaid, Mr. Majumdar, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be closed with a liberty to approach the appropriate Election Tribunal. Page No.# 3/3 5. Accordingly, this writ petition stands closed. It is needless to say that the petitioner shall always be at liberty to approach before the appropriate Election Tribunal as per law, if he/she is aggrieved. JUDGE Comparing Assistant