Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126851 (ALL)

AAS MOHAMMAD AND 5 OTHERS v. CIVIL JUDGE (S.D.)/PRESCRIBED AUTHORITY UNNAO AND 7 OTHERS

WRIA/2570/2025 · 2025-03-07

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14127 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2570 of 2025 Petitioner :- Aas Mohammad And 5 Others Respondent :- Civil Judge (S.D.)/Prescribed Authority Unnao And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hari Anuj Bahadur Sinha Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and perused the record. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioners challenging an order dated 10.12.2024 whereby the delay condonation application, which was filed along with the substitution application was condoned on a cost of Rs.2000/-. 3. Considering the fact that an interlocutory order has been passed, no interference is called for. As the rent case is pending since the year 2002, the Prescribed Authority is directed to decide the same with all expedition preferably within a period of six months. Let a copy of this order be sent by the Senior Registrar of this Court to the trial Court for compliance. 4. The counsel for the petitioner states that he does not want to press this petition. 5. The present petition is dismissed as not pressed, however the directions for expeditious disposal are being passed in the interest of justice considering the fact that the suit is pending since the year 2002. The Prescribed Authority shall send a report to the Senior Registrar of this Court after compliance. Order Date :- 7.3.2025 Arun Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench