Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:UHC:8780-DB
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Appeal From Order No. 437 of 2024 06 October, 2025
Manwar Singh Rawat ………Appellant Versus
Renu Rawat ………Respondent ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Gaurav Paliwal, holding brief of Mr. Nalin Saun, learned counsel for the appellant. Mr. Maneesh Bisht, learned counsel for respondent. ----------------------------------------------------------------------
Coram: Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Hon'ble Alok Mahra, J.
Hon'ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
The challenge in this appeal is made to order the
order dated 08.08.2024 passed in Misc. Case No. 139 of 2021, connected with Original Case No. 963 of 2015, Smt. Renu Rawat vs. Manwar Singh Rawat (“the case”), whereby the learned Judge, Family Court, has allowed the respondent’s application under Order IX Rule 13 C.P.C. and set aside the ex parte judgment dated 15.03.2016 passed in the case.
2.
Today, during the course of hearing, learned counsel for the appellant would submit that the case itself has already been dismissed for non-prosecution on
07.10.2024. A copy of the said order dated 07.10.2024 has been tendered before this Court, which is taken on record. Hence, the present appeal has been rendered infructuous.
3.
In view of the above, the appeal stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
(Alok Mahra, J.) (Ravindra Maithani, J.) 06.10.2025
06.10.2025 Mamta MA MTA RANI Digitally signed by MAMTA RANI DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6a812005bebfcf46f244f3e 584af1449e430ef900bf09a6d67ebb d642671329b, postalCode=263001, st=Uttarakhand, serialNumber=5de1751a4f1d9cabf d54852c9e68911ca8b66dd26690a1 91648ab5d8dd004ef0, cn=MAMTA RANI Date: 2025.10.07 10:32:07 +05'30'