MUNDAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. /ADDL. CHIEF SECY. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLA/729/2025 · 2025-03-04
Karunesh Singh Pawar
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126836 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126836 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13156 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 729 of 2025 Appellant :- Mundar Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Appellant :- Mahendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for appellant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for State. The present appeal has been filed to quash the proceedings of set-aside the impugned summoning order dated 5.12.2024, passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Gonda in Special Trial No.543/2021 (State vs. Smt. Neetu), arising out of Case Crime No.126/2021, under Section 323, 504, 506 1.P.C. and 3(1)da, dha District- Gonda. SC/ST Act.
Learned counsel for appellant, after arguing for some time, submits that present appeal may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to file a bail application which may be decided in view of law laid down by Supreme Court in "Satender Kumar Antil versus Central Bureau of Investigation and another, Special Leave to Appeal (Cri)No.5191 of 2021" to which learned A.G.A. has no objection. In view of the above, the appeal is dismissed as not pressed. However, it is provided that in case the appellant appears before the trial court within two weeks from today and applies for bail, the same shall be decided expeditiously, in view of the law laid down by Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil's case (supra).
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench