PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/1851/2025 · 2025-03-04
Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126832 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126832 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13037-DB
Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1851 of 2025 Petitioner :- Priyanka And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary, J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
2. By means of this writ petition, the petitioners prayed for issuance of mandamus commanding the opposite parties not to disturb the happy and peaceful life of the petitioners and not to harass the petitioners.
3. Petitioners claim to have married each other of their own volition and also claim that on the date of their marriage i.e. 14.02.2025, they were of marriageable age. The petitioners have also annexed the Marriage Certificate issued by the Arya Samaj Mandir, Harsha Vihar, Puraniya, Sector-H, Aliganj, Lucknow as Annexure-2 to the writ petition. Petitioners have annexed High School Certificate-cum-mark-sheets as Annexure No.1 in this regard as proof of age. He further says that there is no F.I.R. against the petitioners and they are not wanted in any criminal case yet the police is harassing them at the behest of family members who are not agreeable to the marriage. Therefore, this petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing the opposite parties not to interfere in peaceful married life of the petitioners.
4. In view of the above, it is provided that if the petitioners have married each other and are living together, were of marriageable age on the date of their marriage and they are not wanted in any
criminal case then the police shall not unnecessarily interfere in their peaceful married life.
5. It is, however, made clear that this Court has not entered into nor adjudicated the age of the petitioners nor veracity/validity of the alleged marriage.
6. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Brij Raj Singh, J.) (Vivek Chaudhary, J.) Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Rao/- Digitally signed by :- CHEBROLU SRINIVASA RAO High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench