Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:14433-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2154 of 2025 Petitioner :- Pawan Kumar @ Pawan Kumar Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Distt. Magistrate Barabanki And 8 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anubhav Awasthi,Prashant Mishra,Varsha Pandey,Vinayak Tiwari Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. If any application for demarcation has been filed as per rules the same be considered and decided keeping in mind the statutory period. 3. However, in future if such grievance is involved the petitioner's counsel should prefer petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India rather than writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India in view of decision in Writ-C No.10001 of 2024 (Vidya Vati vs. District Magistrate District Amethi and 19 others), wherein we have referred to a decision on the subject rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court where the Revenue Court has been held to be amenable to the jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India. 4. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 10.3.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench