Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126797 (ALL)

SMT. POONAM MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF LANGUAGE LKO AND ANOTHER

WRIA/2600/2025 · 2025-03-20

Rajesh Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:16049 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2600 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Poonam Mishra Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Language Lko And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vishwas Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ran Vijay Singh, learned Addl. Chief Standing Counsel for the State-opposite party no.1 and Sri Alok Singh Chauhan, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no.2. Said Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioner has prayed following main reliefs:- "i. To issue a writ of mandamus commanding the opposite parties, directing to opposite party no.2 to regularize the services of the petitioner on the post of Typing Clerk with consequential benefit of services. ii. To issue a writ of mandamus commanding the opposite parties, directing the opposite party no.2 to consider the case of petitioner for regularization of service on the post of Typing clerk as other similarly situated employee already regularized on their contractual posts." 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that for redressal of the aforesaid grievance, the petitioner has preferred representation to the competent authority, but to no avail. Learned counsel for the petitioner has also submitted that the petitioner may be permitted to prefer a fresh representation before opposite party no.2 and this Court may direct opposite party no.2 to pass appropriate order strictly in accordance with law. 4. Learned counsels for the opposite parties have no objection if direction for disposal of the representation is issued. 5. Therefore, without entering into merits of the issue, the petitioner is permitted to prefer a fresh representation to opposite party no.2 i.e. Director, U.P. Sanskrit Sansthan, Room No.520 Fifth Floor, Indira Bhawan, Lucknow taking all pleas and grounds, which are necessary for disposal of the representation and also enclosing the earlier representation, if any, alongwith certified copy of this order within a period of fifteen days from today. If such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the aforesaid representation of the petitioner by speaking and reasoned order, strictly in accordance with law, with expedition, say within a period of three months from the date of receipt of the representation and thereafter communicate the decision thereof to the petitioner forthwith. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition is disposed of finally. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 20.3.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench