TAMANNA AZEEM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF CIVIL SECTT. U.P. LKO. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/2138/2025 · 2025-04-17
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126763 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:21822-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2138 of 2025 Petitioner :- Tamanna Azeem Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Civil Sectt. U.P. Lko. And 5 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Salman Abbas,Shahnaz Bano,Syed Waqar Husain Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard Salman Abbas, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. The petitioner has grievance against the opposite party no. 6, a private party. We fail to understand as to how a writ petition is maintainable in such a matter. The petitioner is free to avail the remedy under the civil or criminal law. With the aforesaid observations/directions, the writ petition is disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Order Date :- 17.4.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench