Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12676 (KAR)

MR. SRINIVASA MURTHY N v. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

WP/14/2025 · 2025-01-15

R Devdas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:1467 WP No. 14 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 14 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN: MR. SRINIVASA MURTHY N S/O A NARAYANAPPA AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/AT WARD NO.2 SHRI. MARIKAMBA SAW MILL KOLAMI RAMAIAH EXTENSION MALURU TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT 563 130 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SUYOG HERELE E., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER KOLAR DISTRICT KOLAR 563130 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND SUB DIVISION MAGISTRATE KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR 563130 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE KOLAR DISTRICT, KOLAR 563 130 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.SHAMANTH NAIK., HCGP) Digitally signed by KRISHNAPPA LAXMI YASHODA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:1467 WP No. 14 of 2025 THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE PERMISSION LETTER/DATED 04/01/2025 IN NO. MAG (2) CR/02/2024-25 ISSUED BY R2 TO THE EXTENT OF CHANGING OF ROUTE FOR THE ROUTE MARCH AND ORDER DATED 04/01/2024 IN NO. MAG (2) CR/02/2024-25 PASSED BY R2, (PRODUCED AT AN ANNEXURE-A AND A1 AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo dated 15.01.2025 stating that in view of the interim orders passed by this Court on 05.01.2025, the event was held peacefully without any law and order issue. 2. It is therefore stated that the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous and therefore, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition. 3. The memo is taken on record subject to all just exceptions. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:1467 WP No. 14 of 2025 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed, as the prayer made in the writ petition has become infructuous. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE JT/- CT: JL