MANISH KUMAR @ MANISH KUMAR KANNAUJIA AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND ANOTHER
A482/2055/2025 · 2025-03-06
Saurabh Lavania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126753 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126753 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13759 Court No. - 12 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 2055 of 2025 Applicant :- Manish Kumar @ Manish Kumar Kannaujia And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Shyamendra Singh,Anoop Kumar,Raj Kumar Verma,Tej Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Saurabh Lavania,J. Sri Pream Narayan Tiwari, Advocate alongwith Sri Anoop Kumar, Advocate, has put in appearance for the private opposite party No. 2 and has filed his Vakalatnama, which is taken on record. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. Instant application has been preferred by the applicant(s) for the following main relief(s):-
"1. To quash the charge sheet dated 28/01/2020 of case crime No 398/2019 under section 498A, 323 I.P.C & 3/4 D.P Act Police Station Malihabad District Lucknow, and order of taking cognizance dated 24/01/2022 registering the case as criminal case no-3203/2022 and summoning the accused and the entire proceedings of criminal case no-3203/2022 (State of U.P versus Manish Kumar & another), pending in the court of learned Special Chief Judicial magistrate Custom District Lucknow; on the basis of Mutual compromise dated 20/02/2025 as contained as Annexure No-1, 2 & 5 of this petition." It is stated that both the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court and have entered into a compromise and a copy of compromise deed, duly signed by the parties, is annexed as Annexure No. 5 to the present application. As such, keeping in view the settlement arrived at between the parties and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in this regard, the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Whether the parties have, in fact, compromised the matter or not, can best be ascertained by the trial court as such compromise has to be duly verified in presence of the parties concerned before the Court. Considering the aforesaid, this application is disposed of finally in following terms:- (i) The parties to the proceedings in issue shall appear and file the compromise before the concerned court within four week's from today. (ii) If the parties appear before the concerned court in terms of above, the concerned Court shall proceed to verify the compromise between the parties to
the proceedings and prepare a report to the same effect and the original compromise deed be made part of record.
(iii) The concerned court shall conclude the process of verification of compromise within two week's from the date of production of copy of this order. (iv) The concerned court shall permit the parties to the proceedings to obtain the certified copy of the report as well as compromise deed. (v) It shall be open to the applicant(s) to approach this Court again for quashing of the proceedings. (vi) Office is directed to provide original compromise, if any, to the counsel for the applicant(s), after retaining its photocopy on record. It is for the purposes for its verification by the concerned court. (vii) For a period of eight weeks, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant(s) in the aforesaid case. Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Arun/- Digitally signed by :- ARUN KUMAR GANGWAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench