SWPAN KUMAR CHAKRAVARTY AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/1996/2025 · 2025-03-06
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126714 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13632 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1996 of 2025 Applicant :- Swpan Kumar Chakravarty And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Manoj Kumar Gupta,Rajesh Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State as well as Shri Pranshu Aggarwal, learned Advocate who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of respondent no. 2 along with counter affidavit which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that compromise was entered between the parties and vide order dated 16.01.2025 both the parties were directed to appear before the concerned court/trial court for verification of the compromise deed which is on record as Annexure No. 14 to the petition. The petitioners as well as respondent no. 2 in compliance of the order dated 16.01.2025 appeared before the Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Anti Corruption Act 2006) Lucknow who in their presence verified the compromise. The copy of the
order is on record as Annexure No. 16 to the petition.
Learned counsel for the parties submit that since the parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the Court by entering into compromise and the said compromise has been verified under the order of the Court, hence, in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab" reported in "(2012) 10 SCC 303", the proceedings impugned are liable to be quashed. Learned A.G.A. has no objection to this prayer.
In view of the above and considering the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of "Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab" reported in "(2012) 10 SCC 303", as well as the fact that the compromise dated 21.11.2024 entered between the parties has been vide order dated 16.01.2025 by Additional Sessions Judge/Special Judge (Anti Corruption Act 2006), Lucknow the proceedings of Sessions Trial No. 602/2011
"Amrit Lal Haveliya Vs. Amitabh Pramanik and others", under Sections 323/504/506/34 IPC, P.S. Kaiserganj, Lucknow are hereby quashed. The petition is disposed of.
Order Date :- 6.3.2025 R.C. Digitally signed by :- RAM CHANDER YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench