UIIC Ltd. Vs. Chetan Prakash & Ors. CMP(M) No. 2137/2025 30.03.2026 Present: Mr. Munish Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Jagdish Thakur, Advocate, for the applicant/appellant. Mr. Aryansh Thakur, Advocate, for respondents No. 1 & 2. Mr. Pankaj Choudhari, Advocate, for respondent No. 3. CMP(M) No. 2137/2025 No reply to the application is intended to be filed on behalf of the non-applicants/respondents. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of the applicant, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay of 36 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal. Consequently, the application is allowed and delay of 36 days’ that has occurred in filing the present appeal, is condoned. The application stands disposed of. FAO No. /2026 Appeal be registered. Heard. Admit. Mr. Aryansh Thakur, Advocate and Mr. Pankaj Choudhari, Advocate, accept service of post admission notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 & 2 and respondent ….2…. No. 3, respectively. They pray for and are granted six weeks’ time to file Power of Attorneys. List thereafter. In the meantime, let records of the learned Tribunal below be called for. CMPST No. 62191/2025 Application be registered. Heard. Subject to deposit of entire award amount, alongwith up-to-date interest, within a period of six weeks, the operation and execution of impugned award dated 17.07.2025, passed by learned Motor Accident Claims Tribunal-II, Kullu, District Kullu, H.P., in Claim Petition No. 55/2020, shall remain stayed during pendency of the main appeal. Alteration, modification or vacation, on motion. The application stands disposed of. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge 30th March, 2026 (raman)