VIGAN SAW ALIAS VIGAN PRASAD ALLIAS BIGEN SAO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
Cr.A(SJ)/511/2025 · 2025-08-01
Gautam Kumar Choudhary
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12669 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12669 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:21433 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No.511 of 20 25
------ Vigan Saw @ Vigan Prasad @ Bigan Sao, son of Shiv Sao, resident of Village Hurdag, P.O. Sewadih, P.S. Ranka, District Garhwa through his mother and natural guardian, Baso Devi @ Basho Devi, wife of Shiv Sao, resident of Village Hurdag, P.O. Sewadih, P.S. Ranka, District Garhwa
.... .... …. Appellant
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Respondent
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GAUTAM KUMAR CHOUDHARY
For the Appellant : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated : 01.08.2025
Earlier bail application of this appellant was rejected on merit by this Court vide order dated 12.01.2024 in Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No.654 of 2023. Instant criminal appeal is renewed on the ground that he has remained in custody for about three years after framing of charge and only two witnesses have been examined.
Learned A.P.P. submits that factually incorrect submission has been made as four witnesses have been examined out of sixteen.
I do not find any change of circumstance for re-considering the bail application, which is accordingly, rejected.
Criminal Appeal is dismissed. Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial.
(Gautam Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anit