S. No. 59 Suppl Cause List-1 IN THE HIGH COURT 0F JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR CM(6154/2025) IN RP 81/2025 GULZAR AHMAD BHAT …Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Amjid Maqbool, Advocate Vs. SYEDA BEGUM AND ORS. ...Respondent(s) Through: Mr. M. A. Makhdoomi, Advocate CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL-JUDGE ORDER 10.12.2025 While arguing for a while, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he would be satisfied in case further time of two months’ time for vacating the premises is given to him and would not press this petition. Learned counsel for the respondents-caveators submits that if the petitioner is given two months further time to vacate, he has no objection. In view of the submissions made, while dismissing this petition, further two months’ time is granted to the petitioner to vacate the premises in question. (VINOD CHATTERJI KOUL) JUDGE Srinagar 10.12.2025. “Imtiyaz” Imtiyaz Ul Gani I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document 11.12.2025 15:36