HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 4581 of 2012 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE ANISH KUMAR GUPTA, J. 1. The matter was taken up in the revised list. However, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition nor any adjournment slip has been moved. However, Shri Krishna Agarwal, learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 and Shri Ambrish Shukla, learned Addl. C.S.C. on behalf of the State respondents are present. 2. In the absence of any effective representation, it appears that the cause of action has become stale and the writ petition has been rendered infructuous by efflux of time. 3. Accordingly the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous Interim order, if any, stands vacated 4. In case the petitioner fells that the matter still survives, liberty is granted to him to move an application for recalling of this order within six weeks from today. September 18, 2025 o.k. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : V.S. Parmar Counsel for Respondent(s) : Krishna Agarwal, Rajesh Tripathi (Anish Kumar Gupta,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Vinod Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- OM KRISHNA CHOUDHARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad