Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126630 (ALL)

POONAM DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND 3 OTHERS

A483/207/2025 · 2025-03-06

Karunesh Singh Pawar

Special Leave Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13700 Court No. - 16 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 483 No. - 207 of 2025 Applicant :- Poonam Devi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shashank Vikram Verma,Ajay Pratap Singh,Mohd. Sheraj Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for respondent State. The present application has been filed by the applicant seeking direction to the learned Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, District Ambedkar Nagar to decide the complaint case no.6510 of 2024, Police Station Kotwali Tanda, District Ambedkar Nagar within a stipulated period. Perused the record. The present complaint has been registered in the year 2024. Hon'ble Supreme Court vide judgment dated 11.03.2022 in the case of M. Gopalakrishnan and others Vs. Pasumpon Muthuramalingam and another, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) Diary No. 30839/2021, has held that undue preference should not be given to the new trials while expediting the proceedings over the old trial. This is a new trial much older trials are pending. Thus, considering the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court M. Gopalakrishnan and others (supra) and the facts of the case, the prayer for expeditious disposal is refused. The application is dismissed accordingly. Order Date :- 6.3.2025 Madhu D.R/P.S Digitally signed by :- MADHU KUMARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench