Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23685 WP No. 160 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 160 OF 2025 (S-RES) BETWEEN:
SRI PRAVEENKUMAR M C/O MAHADEVAIAH M AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS OCC. JUNIOR MANAGEMENT GRADE OFFICE SCALE 1 @ CANARA BANK ARKALGUDU BRANCH HASSAN DISTRICT R/AT 686 2ND STAGE JSS LAYOUT OPP. SHANTHVERI GOPAL GOVADA WATER TANK ALANAHALLI MYSORE DISTRICT MYSORE 570028. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRAKASH M PATIL., ADVOCATE) AND:
THE SENIOR MANAGER CANARA BANK, HRM SECTION CIRCLE OFFICE, BALMANTHA ROAD MANGALROE 575001. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. T P MUTHANNA., ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PETITIONER DATED: 24.12.2018, 22.08.2022 AND 24.06.2024 AS PER ANNEXURE-A, B, AND C AND FURTHER DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO DISPOSE OFF THE APPEAL FILED
Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23685 WP No. 160 of 2025
BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE RESPONDENT DATED:
18.01.2023 VIDE ANNEXURE-D AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
ORAL ORDER This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, seeking a direction to the respondent to dispose of the appeal pending before the respondent filed under Regulation 13 of the Canara Bank (Officers) Service Regulations 1979 (for short, ‘the said Regulations’). 2. The petitioner was appointed as a Clerk in the respondent – Bank on 07.09.2015. Thereafter, promoted as an officer – Junior Management Scale Grade-I, on
20.09.2018. He has given representations requesting for permission to give up his promotion. His request has been rejected by order dated 01.10.2022. Being aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed an appeal under the said Regulations before the first respondent as per Annexure-
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:23685 WP No. 160 of 2025
D. So far, the said appeal has not been decided. Hence, he sought for disposal of the same. 3. The learned counsel for the respondent submits that, if this Court grant some reasonable time, the appeal filed by the petitioner would be considered in accordance with law. 4.
In view of the above, the respondent is directed to dispose of the appeal filed by the petitioner, in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, not later than two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 5. With the above observations, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE
CM LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 57