IN THE 213 Navin @ Naveen State of Haryana CORAM : HON'BLE Present :- Mr. Ms. Mr. for VINOD S. BHARDWAJ The Bharatiya Nagarik petitioner in case Sections 110, 118(1), Sanhita, 2023 at 2. Briefly was registered on who reported that the birthday of his 10:00 PM, the began abusing complainant attempted quarreling with injury on his face lips and additional to Narayana Hospital, THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-62298 Date of decision: Naveen VERSUS Haryana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD Mr. D.S. Matya, Advocate, for the petitioner. Ms. Chhavi Sharma, Astt. AG, Haryana. Mr. Ankit, Advocate ( through V.C.) the complainant. ***** BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) The instant first petition has been filed Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 for case bearing FIR No.200 dated 12.07.2025 118(1), 118(2), 126 and 351(3 at Police Station DLF Phase-3, District Briefly stated, the case of the prosecution on the basis of a statement made that on 09.07.2025, he along with his friend Monu at the residence petitioner arrived at the spot on Neeraj and Bharat, friends of attempted to intervene, the petitioner him, delivering a fist blow to his face with a sharp-edged weapon, resulting onal injuries to his chest. The complainant Hospital, which refused admission, PUNJAB & HARYANA CHANDIGARH 62298-2025(O&M) decision: 12.11.2025 ...Petitioner ...Respondent VINOD S. BHARDWAJ petitioner. Haryana. V.C.) filed under Section 483 of the grant of regular bail to the 12.07.2025 registered under 351(3) of the Bharatiya Nyaya District Gurugram. prosecution is that the present FIR made by the complainant, Rocky, with his friends was celebrating residence of Ricky @ Monu. Around on a Bullet motorcycle and the complainant. When the petitioner allegedly started his right eye and inflicting an resulting in lacerations to his complainant was initially taken admission, and was thereafter shifted to SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.11.13 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 213 CRM Medanta Hospital petitioner was challan/report under Officer, Police Station 3. Learned that the petitioner present case is further contends that have been tabulated as under; Particulars Sr. 4. It is recovered a kitchen complainant do the eye is specifically the upper lip and result of fist blows been attributed counsel thus submits Section 118(2) CRM-M-62298-2025(O&M) Hospital for treatment. During the arrested, and upon completio under Section 173 Cr.P.C. was Station DLF Phase-III, Gurugram. Learned counsel appearing on behalf petitioner is in custody since 23.07.2025. already complete and the final contends that as per the medico legal report reported on the person of the under;- Particulars of total body injuries marked Sr. No. Injury Details 1 RIGHT BLUNT TRAUMA EYE 2 LIP LACERATION AROUND UPPER LIP 3 1 CM LACERATION OVER CHEST is contended that although the kitchen knife from the petitioner, not correspond to the use of such specifically attributed to a punch blow, and the right side of the chest also appear, blows rather than any sharp-edged to the alleged use of the recovered submits that, at best, the facts may of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2 course of investigation, the completion of the investigation, a filed by the Station House Gurugram. behalf of the petitioner contends .07.2025. The investigation in the final report has been filed. He report there are three injuries complainant. The same are marked on above image: Injury Number EYE 1 AROUND 4 CM OVER 2 OVER RIGHT 3 respondents claim to have petitioner, the injuries alleged by the such a weapon. The injury to blow, while the lacerations on appear, prima facie, to be the edged instrument. No injury has recovered kitchen knife.Learned may disclose an offence under Sanhita, 2023, and that an offence SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.11.13 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 213 CRM under Section 110 Section 110, the 5. Learned complainant on antecedents and result of the eye However, they do 6. I have gone through the 7. Taking circumstancesincluding none of the injuries alleged knife recovered, Bharatiya Nyaya with the period investigation stands appropriate to allow 8. Accordingly, ordered to be admitted bonds to the satisfaction concerned. 9. It is and shall not influence indirectly. 10. The CRM-M-62298-2025(O&M) 110 BNS is not made out. He further the remaining offences alleged are Learned State Counsel as well the other hand contend that the is involved in multiple cases. They eye injury, the complainant has do not dispute the period of custody have heard learned counsel for the the documents appended along with Taking into consideration circumstancesincluding the submissions made on injuries sustained by the complainant recovered, and that the applicability Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 itself appears to of custody already undergone and stands concluded, and the trial is allow the present petition. Accordingly, the instant petition is admitted to regular bail subject satisfaction of the trial Court/Duty is made clear that the petitioner influence any prosecution witness The observation made hereinabove 3 further submits that apart from bailable in nature. well as the counsel for the petitioner is having criminal They further contend that as a has suffered a loss of vision. custody of the petitioner. the respective parties and have with the present petition. the totality of the on behalf of the petitioner that complainant are attributable to the applicability of Section 110 of the to be an arguable issuealong and bearing in mind that the yet to commence, I deem it allowed and the petitioner is to his furnishing bail/surety Magistrate/Illaqa Magistrate petitioner shall not extend any threat witness in any manner directly or hereinabove shall not be construed as an SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.11.13 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 213 CRM expression on the on the basis of a 11. Pending 12.11.2025 Sumit Gusain Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable CRM-M-62298-2025(O&M) the merits of the case and the trial available material. Pending application(s), if any, shall (VINOD speaking/reasoned : Yes/No reportable : Yes/No 4 trial Court shall decide the case shall stand disposed of. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JUDGE SUMIT SINGH GUSAIN 2025.11.13 18:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document