Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126540 (ALL)

SMT. KRISHNA KUMARI v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MEDICAL AND HEALTH LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/2494/2025 · 2025-03-04

Alok Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12989 Court No. - 6 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2494 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Krishna Kumari Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Medical And Health Lko. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Lalendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Alok Mathur,J. 1. Heard Sri L.P. Singh, learned counsel for petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. It has been submitted by learned counsel for petitioner that husband of the petitioner, late Raj Kishore Mishra was appointed on the post of Health Assistant (H.A.) on 04.02.1976 and retired from the post of Health Supervisor on 31.05.2014 and unfortunately died on 08.08.2023. During his lifetime he had filed writ petition being Writ A No. 820 of 2022 with grievance that he has not been paid his post retiral dues like G.P.F., arrears of revised pension since 2014 and also claiming salary from the period 01.09.1995 to January, 1996 and approached this Court for a direction to competent authority to decide his claim expeditiously and this Court by means of order dated 17.02.2022 disposed of the aforesaid writ petition. 3. The order dated 17.02.2022 has been complied with except revision of pension which was not granted to him since 2014 and the benefit of grade pay also was not granted to him for which purpose present writ petition has been filed. 4. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner shall be substantially redressed in case respondent No. 3 is directed to consider and decide the grievances of the petitioner keeping in view the letter dated 19.04.2023 sent by C.M.O., Unnao to Additional Director, Medical & Health, Lucknow i.e. respondent No. 3 in a time bound manner. 5. Learned Standing Counsel does not object if a direction is issued to respondent for expeditious disposal of the representation preferred by the petitioner. 6. Accordingly, without entering into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation to respondent Nos. 3 & 4 and in case the said representation is made within two weeks from today, respondent No. 3 shall pass appropriate orders in light of the orders/ letters of Chief Medical Officer, Unnao dated 19.04.2023 within next six weeks and communicate the decision to the petitioner. (Alok Mathur, J.) Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Ravi/ Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- RAVI SHANKAR SRIVASTAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench