Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12654 (PNJ)

ZAKIR HUSSAIN v. AMAR CHAND ANDORS

CR/3325/2004 · 2025-01-24

Alok Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CR-3325-200 IN T (202) ZAKIR HUSS AMAR CHA CORAM: Present: ALOK JAIN 1. order dated 05 2. Mr. Sandeep none is presen 3. behalf of res matter has be 4. was dismisse clearly record 2004 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH HUSSAIN Versus CHAND AND ORS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALO **** None for the petitioner. Ms. Amrita Nagpal, Advocate fo **** JAIN, J. (Oral) The matter has been listed in pu ated 05.12.2024 passed by Hon’ble the As per the office report, learn ndeep Singh Ghangas, Advocate has present on behalf of the petitioner. At this stage, Ms. Amrita Nagp of respondent No. 1 and has submit has been taken back by respondent No A perusal of the record shows ismissed in default on 21.01.2008 records that the respondent has alread 1 NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CR-3325-2004 (O&M) Date of Decision:- 24.01.2025 ……Petitioner ……Respondent ALOK JAIN cate for respondent No. 1. d in pursuance to the administrative the Chief Justice. , learned counsel for the petitioner has been duly informed, however, Nagpal, Advocate has appeared on submitted that the brief of the said ent No. 1. hows that the present civil revision 2008 and order dated 28.03.2014 already taken the possession in the 1 &M) 2025 ioner dent ative ioner ever, d on said ision 2014 n the PARUL 2025.01.28 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document CR-3325-200 year 2001 an hence, the re revision petiti present revisi 5. nothing survi as having bee 6. 24.01.2025 Parul 2004 (O&M) 01 and the sale deed was executed the revision petition has become inf n petition was restored and was directe revision has been listed today. In light of the fact as recorded survives in the present revision petit ng been rendered infructuous. Pending miscellaneous applicatio Whether speaking/reasoned: Whether Reportable:- 2 cuted by the petitioner (herein) and me infructuous, however, since, the directed to be listed as per roster, the orded in the order dated 28.03.2014 n petition and the same is dismissed plication, if any, stands disposed of. (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE oned:- Yes/No Yes/No 2 and , the r, the 2014 issed PARUL 2025.01.28 12:54 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document