MUNSHI LAL YADAV v. STATE OF UP THR. PRIN. SECY. HOME
BAIL/1914/2025 · 2025-04-22
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126539 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126539 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:22869 Court No. - 6 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1914 of 2025 Applicant :- Munshi Lal Yadav Opposite Party :- State Of Up Thr. Prin. Secy. Home Counsel for Applicant :- Rajiva Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State.
2. This is the second bail application. The first bail application was rejected by this Court vide order dated 11.09.2024. In the said order, directions were also issued for examination of PW-1, 2 and 3.
3. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant that after rejection of the bail, the testimony of the fact witnesses have already been record. The testimony of PW-1 as well as the Doctor as PW-7 have also been recorded and only the formal witnesses remain.
4. Considering the fact that the fact witnesses have already been examined and the cross-examination is also done and the applicant is in custody since 05.07.2023 having no criminal history and there is no material to form an opinion that in case, if the applicant is enlarged on bail at this stage, can adversely effect the trial, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail.
5. The bail application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant- Munshi Lal Yadav be released on bail in Case Crime No.267 of 2023, under Section 302 IPC, Police Station- Maigalganj, District- Lakhimpur Kheri on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any
inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such
facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 22.4.2025 Ashutosh Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench