Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12653 (PNJ)

VIJAY KUMAR BAJAJ v. AVTAR SINGH AND ORS.

CR/1876/2018 · 2025-03-25

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 240 Vijay Kumar Bajaj Avtar Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Constitution of India is for (Annexure P filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC for appointment of Local Commissioner was dismissed. that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such. 25.03.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-1876 Date of Decision: Vijay Kumar Bajaj Versus Avtar Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for the petitioner. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Prayer in this revision petition Constitution of India is for quashing of impugned order dated (Annexure P-6) passed by the learned trial filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC for appointment of Local Commissioner was dismissed. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be disposed of, as such. Ordered accordingly. .03.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1876-2018 Date of Decision: 25.03.2025 .… Petitioner .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Nitin Thatai, Advocate for the petitioner. Prayer in this revision petition filed under Article 227 of the quashing of impugned order dated 06.03.2018 6) passed by the learned trial Court whereby the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC for appointment of Local Commissioner was dismissed. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ther speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No under Article 227 of the 06.03.2018 Court whereby the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC for At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the instant revision petition has been rendered infructuous and may be RISHU KATARIA 2025.03.28 17:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.