ASHOK KESHAVRAO PATIL v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
WP/3799/2025 · 2025-03-20
Shri Mangesh S Patil, Shri Y G Khobragade
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12653 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12653 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 936.WP.3799.25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3799 OF 2025 ASHOK KESHAVRAO PATIL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Yogesh B. Bolkar AGP for Respondents: Mr. Amar V. Lavte ... CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL & Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ. DATE : 20.03.2025 PER COURT: Heard the learned advocate for the petitioner as also the learned AGP.
2. The petitioner is seeking benefit of one additional increment earned by him in the last year of the employment just before he was superannuated on 30th June, in the light of Director (Admin. and HR) KPTCL and Ors. Vs. C.P. Mundinamani and Ors. ; 2023 SCC OnLine SC
401.
3. Petitioner’s representation dated 27.01.2025 has been pending with respondent No.6 (Exhibit-C).
4. The learned advocate for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if respondent No.6 is directed to consider the representation. 2025:BHC-AUG:8550-DB
2 936.WP.3799.25.odt
5. The writ petition is disposed of directing respondent No.6 to consider the petitioner’s representation (Exhibit - C), in the light of the aforementioned Supreme Court decision, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within six weeks and in accordance with law.
(Y. G. KHOBRAGADE, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) habeeb/