2025:JHHC:21932 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 6863 of 2016 Sunil Sanjay Minz son of Mansidh Minz, resident of House No. E/698, Sonari East Layout A-Block, P.O. Kajal Nagar, P.S. Sonari, Jamshedpur-II, District East Singhbhum. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Commissioner, South Chhotanagpur Division at Ranchi, P.O. and P.S. Ranchi, District Ranchi. 3. The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Mango, District East Singhbhum. 4. The Deputy Collector, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur, P.O. and P.S. Mango, District East Singhbhum. … … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) :Mr. Piyush Krishna Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondent(s) :Ms. Neelam Tiwary, AC to Sr. SC-II -------- Order No. 6 /Dated: 4th August 2025 The defects pointed out by the Registry is hereby ignored. 2. With the consent of the parties, the instant writ application is taken up for hearing today. 3. The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioner for the following reliefs: “1. That in the instant writ petition, the petitioner prays for issuance of the an appropriate writ or writs, order or orders, direction or directions, or a writ in the nature of mandamus, commanding and directing upon the respondents specially the respondent no.3 (The Deputy Commissioner, East Singhbhum at Jamshedpur) to immediately and forthwith pay the entire salary of the petitioner for the period from 16.03.1999 to 29.09.2012 with interest and also to pay the benefit of 1st A.C.P. and other consequential benefits. And/Or For the issuance of any other appropriate writ (s) / order (s) / direction (s) for doing conscionable justice to the petitioners.” 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that entire salary of the petitioner for the period from 16.03.1999 to 29.09.2012 has not been paid to him. He further submits that the petitioner regularly approached to respondent no.3 with a prayer to make payment of arrears of salary for the period from 16.03.1999 to 29.09.2012 and also to pay the benefit of ACP 2025:JHHC:21932 2 but the 3rd Respondent, one way or the other, did not take any care in this regard. He further submits that this writ application may be disposed of by directing the concerned respondent to consider the claim of the petitioner made in the instant writ application. 5. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner may approach the 3rd Respondent for redressal of his grievance by filing a fresh representation. 6. Having regard to the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by the rival parties; the instant writ application is disposed of by directing the Petitioner to approach the 3rd Respondent by filing a fresh representation. The 3rd Respondent shall take a decision in the matter with regard to the claim made in this writ application by passing a reasoned and speaking order. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the fresh Representation. 7. Pending I.As, if any, also stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) Amit