SHRIKRISHNA YADAV AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. FORST. LKO AND 3 OTHERS
WRIA/2508/2025 · 2025-05-30
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126493 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126493 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:34137 Court No. - 3 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2508 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shrikrishna Yadav And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Forst. Lko And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- I.M. Pandey Ist,Ajeet Verma Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rishabh Tripathi Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel appearing for the respondent no. 1 and Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 2 to 4. 2. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is being finally decided. 3. Instant petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 24.10.2024 and 21.11.2024, copy of which are Annexures No. 1 and 2 to the petition. Further prayer is for a writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to grant the petitioners promotion from Assistant Grade-III to Assistant Grade-II notionally from the date of their entitlement i.e. 20.09.2013 in terms of Rule 16(3)(ii)(c) of Chapter - II of the Service Regulation of the Corporation framed under the U.P. Forest Corporation Act,
1974. 4. Bereft of unnecessary details, the contention of learned counsel for the petitioners is that the matter in issue is squarely covered by the judgment and order of this Court at Allahabad passed in Writ-A No. 5819 of 2019 in re: Ram Saran Vs. State of UP and 3 Others decided on 12.03.2019, a copy of which is Annexure No.6 to the petition. 5. Today, Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 2 and 4, on the basis of instructions dated 27.03.2025 sent by General Manager (Karmik), U.P. Forest Corporation, states that against the judgment of this Court passed in the case of Ram Saran (supra), the Corporation has filed Special Appeal Defective No. 1114 of 2019 in re: U.P. Forest Corporation and 2 Others Vs. Ram Saran and Another but no stay order has been granted in the said special appeal. He further states that Ram Saran has been granted the benefit of said judgment subject to decision in the aforesaid special appeal. 6. Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.
2 to 4 further argues that the general body of the Corporation has passed a resolution dated 03.05.2023 to amend the service regulations which provides for an automatic promotion after a person has rendered ten years meritorious service as Assistant Grade-III which decision has been sent to the State Government. 7. However, Shri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 2 to 4 fairly states that no decision has been taken by the State Government till date consequently, the rules still continue to operate. 8. Considering the aforesaid more particularly when the petitioners are seeking the parity of the judgment passed in the case of Ram Saran (supra) and the fact that learned counsel for the respondents has failed to indicate as to why the benefit of the said judgment be not made available to the petitioners and also the fact that despite a special appeal having been filed by the respondents the order passed by the writ Court has not been stayed, as such, this Court is of the view that the petitioners are entitled for the benefit of the judgment of this Court in re; Ram Saran (supra). 9. Keeping in view the aforesaid discussion, the writ petition is allowed. The orders impugned dated 24.10.2024 and 21.11.2024, copy of which are Annexures No. 1 & 2 to the petition, are hereby set aside. 10. Respondents are directed to grant the benefit of judgment and order passed by this Court in the case of Ram Saran (supra) to the petitioners also. 11. Order of promotion, if any, granted to the petitioners in pursuance to this order would be subject to the decision of Special Appeal Defective No. 1114 of 2019 to which learned counsel for the petitioners also agrees. 12. Let such an order be passed within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order. [Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.] Order Date :- 30.5.2025 RBS/- Digitally signed by :- RAM BIR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench