SRASHTI SAXENA AND 26 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDU. GOVT. OF U.P. LKO. AND 31 OTHERS
WRIA/2530/2025 · 2025-03-04
Abdul Moin
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126450 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126450 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13089 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2530 of 2025 Petitioner :- Srashti Saxena And 26 Others Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Govt. Of U.P. Lko. And 31 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amrendra Nath Tripathi,Durga Prasad Shukla Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Abhinav Singh,Kumar Ayush,Net Ram,Pradeep Tiwari,Ran Vijay Singh,Ravi Prakash Yadav,Rishabh Tripathi,Shailendra Singh Rajawat,Shivam Sharma,Uday Veer Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Standing Counsel for respondents no.1 and 2, Sri Ran Vijay Singh,
learned counsel for respondents no.3 to 19, Sri Rishabh Tripathi, learned counsel for respondents no. 20 and 21, Dr. Udai Veer Singh, learned counsel for respondents no.22 and 23, Sri Pradeep Tiwari, learned counsel for respondent no.24, Sri Shivam Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.25, Sri Net Ram, learned counsel for respondent no.26, Sri Ravi Prakash Yadav, learned counsel for respondent no.27, Sri Abhinav Singh, learned counsel for respondent no.28, Sri Shailendra Singh Rajawat, learned counsel for respondent nos.29 and 30, and Sri Kumar Ayush, learned counsel for respondents no.31 and 32.
2. Admittedly, all the petitioners had been transferred on mutual basis and they have also joined at the transferred place and likewise the persons against whom mutual transfer was made have also joined. Now, by means of instant petition, the petitioners seek to challenge Para 3 of the Circular dated
19.06.2024.
3. Once the petitioners have already joined along with their counterparts and no objection was raised at that stretch of time to their transfer consequently after having joined, the instant petition raising a challenge to the transfer policy would not be maintainable. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 4.3.2025 A. Katiyar Digitally signed by :- AMIT KATIYAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench