Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 12645 (KAR)

SRI. M.D.GANGADHARA v. KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION BRANCH OFFICE

WP/210/2017 · 2025-02-11

Jyoti Mulimani

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6024 WP No. 210 of 2017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI WRIT PETITION NO. 210 OF 2017 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI. M.D.GANGADHARA S/O SRI.THIMAIAH @ DUNDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, PROP: M/S MALE MAHADESHWARA SAMUDAYA BHAVANA, R/O # 259, G.M.ROAD, KOTE, MALAVALLI TOWN, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 430. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SIDDANOORU VISHWANATHA., ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND: KARNATAKA STATE FINANCIAL CORPORATION, BRANCH OFFICE, SUBHASH NAGAR, K.R.ROAD, MANDYA - 571 401. REPRESENTED BY AUTHORIZED OFFICER. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. BIPINHEGDE., ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, SEEKING CERTAIN RELIEFS. THIS WRIT PETITION IS LISTED FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER: Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6024 WP No. 210 of 2017 ORAL ORDER Though the matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. When the case is listed and is called out, the advocate must be present. His absence may affect the case. As could be seen from the daily order sheet the petition was listed on 29.01.2025, on that day, when the matter was called, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner, either personally or through video conferencing. Hence, it was ordered to be listed on 11.02.2025. The petition is listed today. As could be seen from the petition papers, the petition is filed in the year 2017. Now we are in the month of February 2025. The petition is pending from eight years. As already noted above, though the matter called twice, the petitioner is not represented. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE MRP List No.: 2 Sl No.: 20