MANMOHAN SINGH NEGI AND ORS v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
WPCRL/1174/2024 · 2025-05-06
Pankaj Purohit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12640 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12640 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
WPCRL No.1174 of 2024 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. None is present for the petitioners even in the revised call.
2. Ms. Sweta B. Dobhal, learned Brief Holder for the State.
3.
Learned counsel for the State has filed counter affidavit indicating therein that after investigation, the charge-sheet has been submitted on 02.11.2024 against the petitioner nos.1 and 2 while petitioner no.3 has been exonerated during investigation.
4. In view of the statement made by
learned counsel for the State, nothing remains to be decided in this present petition. The same is dismissed as infructuous.
5. However, it is open to the charge- sheeted petitioners to challenge the charge- sheet in appropriate proceedings, before the appropriate forum.
6. Pending application, if any, stands
disposed of accordingly.
(Pankaj Purohit J.)
06.05.2025 Ravi