GOVINDRAM S/O PURSHOTTAM SONI v. THE STATION OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMP/1835/2025 · 2025-09-25
Sudesh Bansal
Criminal Appealbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12640 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12640 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:39653] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1835/2025 Govindram S/o Purshottam Soni, Aged About 68 Years, Resident Of Lodha Chowk, Police Station Kekri, District Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus
1. The Station Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor.
2. Mod Singh Ranawat S/o Shri Moti Singh Ranawat, R/o Jagdish Colony, Kekri, District Ajmer.
3. Laxman Singh S/o Shri Samunder Singh, R/o New Shastri Nagar Colony, Pratap Nagar, Kekri, District Ajmer. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.P. Dadhich, Mr. Dikshant Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 25/09/2025
1. Instant petition has been listed in the defect category.
2. In instant petition, while impugning the judgment of conviction and sentence dated 09.06.2015 passed by the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate No.1, Kekri, District Ajmer in Criminal Case No.393/2008, petitioner has also prayed to quash the proceedings of Criminal Appeal No.40/2015 filed thereagainst and pending before the Additional District & Sessions Court No.1, Kekri, District Ajmer.
3. The ground so raised by petitioner for quashing the entire proceedings of criminal appeal, is that the complainant has entered into compromise with other co-accused, which has
[2025:RJ-JP:39653] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-1835/2025] material bearing on continuation of the criminal proceedings against petitioner. However, counsel for petitioner, after arguing the petition for some time, seeks permission to withdraw the same with liberty to raise such contention/ ground before the appellate Court.
4. In view of above, without expressing any opinion on merits, instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to raise such contention/ ground before the appellate Court. In case, such contention/ ground is raised by petitioner before the appellate Court, it is expected that the appellate Court shall ponder over such ground and decide the same, in accordance with law.
5. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J Sachin/172