AMAR SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE DEPTT. GOVT. LKO AND 37 OTHERS
WPIL/214/2025 · 2025-03-04
Attau Rahman Masoodi, Subhash Vidyarthi
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126388 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126388 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12981-DB Court No. - 1 Case :- PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 214 of 2025 Petitioner :- Amar Singh Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Govt. Lko And 37 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Harish Chandra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Namit Sharma,Ratnesh Chandra Hon'ble Attau Rahman Masoodi,J. Hon'ble Subhash Vidyarthi,J.
1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri S.S. Chauhan learned counsel on behalf of the opposite party nos. 5 and 6 is taken on record.
2. Sri S.S. Chauhan learned counsel has made a categorical statement to the effect that the order passed by the writ court on 29.8.2024 in Public Interest Litigation(PIL) No. 366 of 2023 has been obeyed in letter and spirit once the proceedings for eviction under the Uttar Pradesh Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1972 against all the persons who have violated the terms of the allotment have been initiated before the competent authority.
3. That being the position, the grievance raised in the present writ petition stands redressed, however the prescribed authority is directed to proceed with the matter expeditiously and conclude the proceedings in accordance with law.
4. The writ petion is accordingly disposed of. [Subhash Vidyarthi,J.] [Attau Rahman Masoodi, J.] Order Date :- 4.3.2025 kanhaiya Digitally signed by :- KANHAIYA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench