Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126362 (ALL)

SHRI MAHESH KUMAR NIMBEKAR v. DR. SACHIN KUMAR VERMA, S.D.M., TEHSIL-SAROJINI NAGAR, LKO.

CAPL/1034/2024 · 2025-07-25

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:43091 Court No. - 17 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1034 of 2024 Applicant :- Shri Mahesh Kumar Nimbekar Opposite Party :- Dr. Sachin Kumar Verma, S.D.M., Tehsil-Sarojini Nagar, Lko. Counsel for Applicant :- Trideep Narayan Pandey,Nivedita Shukla,Priya Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Mahesh Kumar Sharma,Rahul Yadav,Sharvan Kumar Pal Hon'ble Rajeev Singh,J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Rakesh Sharma and Shri Vijay Prakash Lal, Advocates on behalf of the applicant is taken on record. Short counter affidavit filed by learned counsel for respondent no. 2 is also taken on record. 2. Learned counsel for the respondent no. 2 submits that Rs.10,000/- is being deducted from the salary of respondent no. 2, which is being handed over to the applicant in compliance of the directions of the Tribunal. It is, thus, submitted that the application has lost its efficacy and may be dismissed. 3. Considering the submissions of the learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel appearing for respondent no. 2 and going through the order of the writ Court as well as contents of the short counter affidavit, it is evident that an amount of Rs.10,000/- is being deducted from the salary of the respondent no. 2 by the Department, which is being paid to the applicant. 4. The application, accordingly, stands dismissed as infructuous. Order Date :- 25.7.2025 VKS Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VIVEK KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench