SANTOSH SINGH @ SANTOSH KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
CRLR/262/2025 · 2025-03-04
Karunesh Singh Pawar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126353 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126353 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12892 Court No. - 16 Case :- CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 262 of 2025 Revisionist :- Santosh Singh @ Santosh Kumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Another Counsel for Revisionist :- Awadhesh Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Karunesh Singh Pawar,J. In view of the proposed order being passed, notices to respondent No.2 is dispensed with. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist and learned A.G.A. for the State-respondent. This revision has been filed against the judgment and order dated 07.02.2025 passed by Principal Judge, Family Court, Ambedkar Nagar in Case No.83 of 2022 under Section 125 Cr.P.C., P.S. Bhiti, District Ambedkar Nagar. Perused the record. A perusal of the impugned order dated 07.02.2025 shows that the application 16(b) remain pending for a period of six months although it was filed on 27.06.2023. This application was given during the period when the evidence was being led and thus, has had an effect of prolonging the trial and, therefore, the cost of Rs.10,000/- has been imposed by the learned court below in which I find no illegality. The revision being devoid of merits is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 4.3.2025 Saurabh Yadav/- Digitally signed by :- SAURABH YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench