AZMAT RAINA MALIK v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K TH.CHIEF SECRETARY TO GOVT AND OTHERS
WP(C)/3191/2025 · 2025-12-20
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12635 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12635 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 67 SUPPLEMENTARY CAUSE LIST-I
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR WP(C) 3191/2025 CM(8588/2025) Azmat Raina Malik. …Petitioner(s) Through: Mr. Ibrahim Meraj, Advocate. Vs. Union Territory of J&K Th. Chief Secretary and Ors. ...Respondent(s) Through: None.
CORAM: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Wasim Sadiq Nargal, Judge.
ORDER 20.12.2025 01.After arguing for a while when the learned counsel for the petitioner was confronted with the maintainability of the instant petition as the instant petition raises disputed questions of fact, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would feel satisfied that in case a direction is issued to the Deputy Commissioner, Anantnag to accord
consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner on 13th of October, 2025 within some timeframe to which Mr. Hakeem Aman Ali, learned Deputy Advocate General appears on the asking of the Court is not
averse provided the same is directed to be accorded
consideration strictly under rule and as per law. 02.With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent No. 2 to accord consideration to the representation alleged to have been filed by the petitioner and which has been placed on record as Annexure-III with the instant petition strictly under rules and as per law within a period of four weeks from the date a copy of this order along with the writ petition and annexures are made available to the said respondent.
The writ petition is, accordingly disposed of in the manner indicated above.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal)
Judge
SRINAGAR: 20.12.2025 Bisma