KIMUDU PRABHU v. THE AP POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED
WP/8319/2025 · 2025-04-01
Subba Reddy Satti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12635 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 12635 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010150272025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY ,THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 8319/2025 Between: Kimudu Prabhu and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The Ap Power Generation Corporation Limited and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
:: ORDER ::
Heard G.V. Shivaji, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned standing counsel for respondents 1 to 3. 2. Impugning letter No.SE/Civil (O & M)C/SLR/D.No.766/2025 dated 04.03.2025, issued by respondent No.3, awarding contract works in pursuance of tender notices S200011110/SE/Civil/O&M/495/25-26 and S200011109/SE/Civil/O&M/495/25-26, dated 12.02.2025, in favour of prospective bidders, the above writ petition, is filed. 3. At the hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that respondent No.3 is awarding tender in favour of prospective bidders, in violation of tender conditions 11 and 12. Page 2 of 3
SRS,J
W.P.No.8319 of 2025
4. Learned standing counsel, produced a copy of the instructions furnished by the Superintending Engineer and submitted that since the bidders have quoted at abnormally low rates, the authority intends to cancel the aforementioned tender and call for fresh tenders as per the requirement. 5. The relevant part of the instructions is extracted hereunder:
“It is to inform that for the subject work under No.1, Ten (10) Nos. tenderers (SC/ST societies and individuals only) have quoted their rates at 76% less by all the bidders and no bids are received by online. One of the bidders (by name Sri. Ch. Syamson, Upper Sileru was selected by lottery) was requested to attend this office for concluding the agreement. It is to inform that for the subject work under No.2, Ten (10) Nos. tenderers (SC/ST societies and individuals only) have quoted their rates at 68% less by all the bidders and no bids are received by online. One of the bidders (by name Sri. A. Seetha Ramulu, Upper Sileru was selected by lottery) was requested to attend this office for concluding the agreement. … It is to submit that since the bidders have quoted their rates at abnormally less, we are under the opinion to cancel the tenders and call for fresh tenders as per the requirement. ”
6.
Given the instructions of the Superintending Engineer, since the authority intends to cancel the tenders and go for fresh tenders, no further adjudication is required in this writ petition. 7. Hence, this writ petition is closed. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 01.04.2025 IKN
SRS,J
W.P.No.8319 of 2025
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
WRIT PETITION No.8319 of 2025
Dated: 01.04.2025
IKN