( 2025:JHHC:15303 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.4020 of 2025 ------ Kongress Prasad Yadav, aged about 50 years, son of Bahadur Mahto, resident of village Badbad, P.O. and P.S. Madhupur, District Deoghar, Jharkhand. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Mrin Moy Ghosal, son of Late Hiron Moy Ghosal, resident of 359/3, G.T. Road, Salkia, Howrah, P.O. and P.S. Golabari, District Howrah, West Bengal. .... .... .... Opposite Parties ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Arvind Kr. Choudhary, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sanjay Kr. Srivastava, Addl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated- 12-06-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Complaint Case No.232 of 2022 registered for the offences punishable under Section 406 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was the power of attorney holder of the complainant and did not pay the consideration amount of the sale deed executed by him by virtue of such power of attorney; to complainant. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has paid all the consideration amount received from the purchasers and the complainant has also filed Original Suit No.02 of 2022 which is pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Senior Division), Madhupur. It is next submitted that the dispute between the parties is basically a civil dispute. It is next submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as has been mentioned in para-13 of this bail application. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and will not annoy or disturb the complainant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 20.02.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M., Madhupur in connection with Complaint Case No.232 of 2022 with the condition that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number and will not annoy or disturb the complainant and witnesses of the case during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/