RAJIT RAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. ENERGY AND PETROLEUM DEPTT. LKO. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/2178/2025 · 2025-03-05
Om Prakash Shukla, Rajan Roy
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126314 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 126314 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:13475-DB Court No. - 2 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 2178 of 2025 Petitioner :- Rajit Ram And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Energy And Petroleum Deptt. Lko. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vinod Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Manish Jauhari Hon'ble Rajan Roy,J. Hon'ble Om Prakash Shukla,J. Heard Shri Vinod Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State and Shri Manish Jauhari, learned counsel for the Electricity Corporation. The petitioners have challenged recovery citation dated 26.12.2024 issued by the opp. party No. 3. Contention is that after the provisional assessment the petitioner filed objection, whereupon fresh inspection was ordered by the Executive Engineer and till date no final assessment order has been passed, yet the recovery citation has been issued. Let the opp. party No. 4 get the facts verified and if he finds that the final assessment has not been made as yet, he shall withdraw the recovery-certificate, however, if he finds that the same has been done, after service of provisional assessment
order upon the petitioners and considering the objections, if any, then he shall inform the petitioners in writing about the same. Let this exercise be completed within 3 weeks. Till then or till fresh decision is taken, impugned recovery shall remain in abeyance. With the above observations/directions, this writ petition is
disposed of. . (Om Prakash Shukla,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.)
Order Date :- 5.3.2025 R.K.P. Digitally signed by :- RAJ KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench