Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 1263 (UTT)

SUNIL JOSHI v. ANSHUMAN JOSHI

AO/12/2025 · 2025-02-13

Vivek Bharti Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:UHC:1226 SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS 13.02.2025 A.O. No. 12 of 2025 Hon’ble Vivek Bharti Sharma, J. Mr. Ravi Bisht, counsel for the appellant. 2. Parties are present in person in the Court. 3. Counsel for the appellant would submit that the parties have amicably settled the dispute and a compromise deed has been executed between the parties; that, the original copy of the same is placed in A.O. No. 11 of 2025 along with Compromise Application (IA 1 of 2025); that, now nothing remains in the present appeal, therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the present appeal. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (Vivek Bharti Sharma, J.) 13.02.2025 Mamta