Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12461 Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2452 of 2025 Petitioner :- Akash Agarwal Respondent :- U.P. Rajkiya Nirman Nigam Ltd. Thru. Managing Director And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shobhit Nigam,Amitesh Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- Shishir Jain,Akhilesh Pratap Singh Hon'ble Abdul Moin,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms Kavya Jain holding brief of Shri Shishir Jain, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.1 & 2 and Shri Akhilesh Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. With the consent of learned counsel appearing for the contesting parties, the writ petition is finally being disposed of. Contention of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is that despite the petitioner having retired on 31.08.2018, the Employee Provident Fund payable by the respondent No.3 has not been paid to the petitioner till date. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with regard to the relief sought in the writ petition, the petitioner may be permitted to submit a representation before the respondent no.3 which may be directed to be decided within a fixed time frame to which learned Standing Counsel has no objection. In view of the above, it is provided that in case the petitioner submits a representation within two weeks from today before the respondent no.3 then the respondent no.3 shall endevour to decide the same by means of a reasoned and speaking order within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order along with representation. With the aforesaid direction, writ petition is disposed of. It is made clear that this Court has not gone into the merits of the claim set forth by the petitioner. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 prateek Digitally signed by :- PRATEEK ARORA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench