IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 250 AMANDEEP SINGH ALIAS AMAN STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. by way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Rajasansi, Amritsar, filed in the Court, which read thus: IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM Date of decision: 01.09.2025 AMANDEEP SINGH ALIAS AMAN Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Balbir Singh Jaswal, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned State counsel refers to paras 7 to 9 of the status report by way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Rajasansi, Amritsar, filed in the Court, which read thus: “7. That this Hon'ble Court was pleased to grant concession of pre-arrest bail to the co Tanmanpreet Singh and Simranjit Singh vide order dated 07.02.2025 and 17.03.2025 passed in CRM 2025 and CRM-M-14152 of 2025. 8. That an Investigation Report/Challan was submitted in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sub-division Ajnala, Amritsar against the co accused Kulwant Singh and Simranjit Singh on 24.03.2025 and the case was committed to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Amritsar for the trial vide order dated 15.05.2025 and supplementary Investigation Report/Challan was submitted in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sub Amritsar against the co- Tanmanpreet Singh on 18.06.2025 and the case was committed to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Amritsar for the trial vide order dated 28.08.2025. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar has not yet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-M-1805-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 01.09.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Balbir Singh Jaswal, Advocate, Mr. Jasjit Singh, DAG, Punjab. Learned State counsel refers to paras 7 to 9 of the status report by way of affidavit of the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Sub Division Rajasansi, Amritsar, filed in the Court, which read thus: That this Hon'ble Court was pleased to grant a arrest bail to the co-accused Tanmanpreet Singh and Simranjit Singh vide order dated 07.02.2025 and 17.03.2025 passed in CRM-M-7191 of 14152 of 2025. That an Investigation Report/Challan was earned Judicial Magistrate First division Ajnala, Amritsar against the co- accused Kulwant Singh and Simranjit Singh on 24.03.2025 and the case was committed to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Amritsar for the trial vide order dated 25 and supplementary Investigation Report/Challan was submitted in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate First Class, Sub-division Ajnala, -accused Satbir Singh and Tanmanpreet Singh on 18.06.2025 and the case was Court of learned Sessions Judge, Amritsar for the trial vide order dated 28.08.2025. The learned Additional Sessions Judge, Amritsar has not yet PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.02 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-1805-2025 -2- framed Charges against the co-accused. Now the next date of hearing is fixed as 03.09.2025 for the consideration on Charge. 9. That it is humbly submitted that the allegations of the petitioner relating to the lack of interest of the Police to investigate the case properly or of not taking the matter seriously to arrest the accused person are misconceived and not based on correct facts. The investigation of the case is being conducted in a professional manner as per the standard procedures envisaged under the Punjab Police Rules, 1934 and BNSS and the Police Officials of the Police Station Lopoke, Amritsar (Rural) are committed and duty bound to arrest the accused of the case by making all possible efforts in accordance with the law. The deponent is personally supervising the entire investigation by taking a keen interest and issuing required guidelines and necessary directions from time to time to the investigating officers for investigating the case on priority basis as per the satisfaction of the petitioner.” 2. In view of the above, no further order is required to be passed and, as such, the present petition stands disposed of. 01.09.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.09.02 18:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.