Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126223 (ALL)

ANIL KUMAR KANOJIYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/1790/2025 · 2025-03-03

Brij Raj Singh, Vivek Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12592-DB Court No. - 10 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 1790 of 2025 Petitioner :- Anil Kumar Kanojiya Respondent :- State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shubh Sri Kanha,Anurag Srivastava,Prince Pandey,Sharad Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Chaudhary,J. Hon'ble Brij Raj Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.G.A. appearing for the State/opposite parties and perused the record. This petition seeks issuance of direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing the impugned F.I.R. dated 19.11.2024, bearing Case Crime No.0286 of 2024, for the offence under Sections 212,353(2) of B.N.S.,2023 and Section 67 of I.T. Act, 2008, registered at Police Station Badosarai, District Barabanki. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the offences as alleged in FIR have maximum punishment for the term less than seven years imprisonment, whereas, the police is trying to arrest him, which is against the mandates of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Learned Additional Government Advocate appearing for respondent State has given a statement on behalf of investigating agency that because the offence allegedly committed by the petitioner, entails sentence of less than seven years, provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,2023 shall be strictly followed in terms of judgment rendered by Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in a case reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273: Arnesh Kumar vs. State of Bihar and another. Considering the stand of the investigating agency, learned counsel for the petitioner states that let this petition be disposed of in view of the above said facts. Accordingly, this petition is disposed of in view of the provisions of Section 35(3) of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 and the law as laid down by Apex Court in the case of Arnesh Kumar (supra). (Brij Raj Singh,J.) (Vivek Chaudhary,J.) Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Arjun/- Digitally signed by :- ARJUN PRASAD High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench