IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4045 of 2023 Decided on: 9th September, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- M/s Sandhar Technologies Ltd. …..Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and others .....Respondents ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua Whether approved for reporting?1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Sunil Mohan Goel, Senior Advocate with Mr. Raman Jamalta, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. L.N. Sharma, Additional Advocate General. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Hearing in this matter was started on 08.09.2025. During the course of today’s hearing, learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner submitted that on account of subsequent developments, more specifically, the fact that the petitioner after filing of the writ petition has shifted its premises to some other place, the cause of action raised in the instant writ petition has been rendered infructuous. He, therefore, submits that the writ petition be permitted to be 1Whether reporters of print and electronic media may be allowed to see the order? Yes. 2 withdrawn, however, question of law raised herein be left open for consideration in appropriate proceedings in accordance with law. Prayer is not objected to by learned Additional Advocate General. 2. Leaving question of law raised in this petition open, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua September 09, 2025 Judge Mukesh