- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:16685 RSA No. 389 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 389 OF 2021 (MON) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. BHAVANI AMMA, W/O LATE VENKATRAMAN BHAT, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, R/AT PATRAME VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT – 574 198 2. SMT. UMASHANKARI W/O SUBRAYA BHAT T. AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT VANASUMA, NEKKILADY HOUSE, ALANKAR VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK – 574 198 3. SMT. USHA KUMARI W/O K. ISHWARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/AT SOORNGAL HOUSE, KADESHIVALAYA VILLAGE AND POST, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K – 574 198 4. B MAHALINGESHWARA BHAT, S/O VENKATRAMANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, 5. B. SHYAMARAJ, S/O VENKATRAMANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, Digitally signed by SUNITHA K S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:16685 RSA No. 389 of 2021 6. VINUSHA RAMANA, S/O MAHALINGESHWARA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, APPELLANTS NO.4 TO 6 ARE RESIDING AT BOLODI HOUSE, PATRAME VILLAGE AND POST, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT – 574 198 …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. K. SHRIHARI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. B.N. MAHALINGA BHAT S/O B. NARYANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/AT BILLAMPADAVU HOUSE, SATHYASAYI VIHAR, ALIKE VILLAGE AND POST, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. – 574 214 2. SRIKRISHNA B.N. S/O NARAYANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/AT BILLAMPADAVU HOUSE, SATHYASAYI VIHAR, ALIKE VILLAGE AND POST, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. – 574 214. 3. UDAYAKUMAR RAMAKRISHNA B.N. S/O NARYANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/AT BILLAMPADAVU HOUSE, SATHYASAYI VIHAR – 574 214. ALIKE VILLAGE AND POST, BANTWAL TALUK, D.K. 4. M KRISHNA BHAT, S/O M. SHANAKARA - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:16685 RSA No. 389 of 2021 NARAYANA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS 5. MRS. INDIRA W/O LATE M. VITTAL BHAT, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 6. SAMANTHA S/O LATE M. VITTALA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 15 YEARS, MINOR REPRESENTED BY MOTHER RESPONDENT NO.5 7. MS. INCHRA D/O LATE M. VITTALA BHAT, AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, RESPONDENTS NO. 4 AND 7 ARE RESIDING AT MOODAJE HOUSE, ILANTHILA POST AND VILLAGE, BELTHANGADY TALUK, D.K. DISTRICT – 574 198 …RESPONDENTS THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 06.10.2020 PASSED IN RA NO.09/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT BELTHANAGADI DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.07.2019 PASSED IN OS NO.132/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL.CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., AT BELTHANGADY. THIS RSA, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:16685 RSA No. 389 of 2021 ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellants filed a memo stating that the matter is settled out of the Court and in view of the same, the appeal may be dismissed as withdrawn. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. The Appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (ASHOK S.KINAGI) JUDGE rs List No.: 1 Sl No.: 42