Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 126207 (ALL)

SHANKAR @ SHANKAR LAL v. BOARD OF REVENUE, U.P. LKO. THRU. ITS CHAIRMAN AND 3 OTHERS

A227/1100/2025 · 2025-03-03

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC-LKO:12486 Court No. - 8 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 1100 of 2025 Petitioner :- Shankar @ Shankar Lal Respondent :- Board Of Revenue, U.P. Lko. Thru. Its Chairman And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sushmita Mishra Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Dilip Kumar Pandey Hon'ble Jaspreet Singh,J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner. Notice on behalf of the respondents No.1 and 4 has been accepted by the office of the Chief Standing Counsel. Sri Dilip Kumar Pandey, learned counsel has accepted notice on behalf of respondent no. 3-Gram Sabha. In view of the order proposed to be passed by this Court, notice to the private-respondent Nos. 2 is dispensed with. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of his Case bearing Revision No. 379 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. R-2024104600379) Ramasrey Vs. Shankar Alias Shankar Lal and other filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 pending before the respondent No.1. It is submitted that though a large number of dates have been fixed, however, for the reasons beyond control, the matter has not yet been decided. Learned standing counsel submits that he has no objection in case an expedite order is passed. Considering the facts and circumstances, this Court is of the opinion that no gainful purpose will be served in keeping the aforesaid petition pending rather ends of justice can be served by directing the respondent No.1 to consider and finally decide the pending proceedings of Case bearing Revision No. 379 of 2024 (Computerized Case No. R-2024104600379) Ramasrey Vs. Shankar Alias Shankar Lal and other filed under Section 210 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 as expeditiously as possible, affording full opportunity of hearing to the parties, but without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties . It is made clear that the Court has not examined the case of either of the parties on merits and the authority concerned shall consider and decide the matter strictly in accordance with law. With the aforesaid, the petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 3.3.2025 Asheesh/- Digitally signed by :- ASHEESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench